Art vs Design

I am exploring the topic of "art vs design", because I feel like this is a topic with sufficient enough depth that you could hold a conference about it. Lots of people believe that design is simply another division of "art" itself, but I personally believe they are two separate entities (but still do overlap in a lot of areas). I made a venn diagram to examine their differences and similarities:

insert pic here

I have already discussed this topic with several people, and we all have differing views, which is a good sign that this is controversial enough to make a good basis for an interesting conference, which people can debate (as the lecturers said, if everyone agrees it is boring).

Art

• Art has an emotional context.
• Art asks the questions, without answering them.
• Art has varied meanings and can be interpreted differently.
• Art is created for the artist. Much of an artist’s work is created and then displayed or sold. The process is free-flowing and organic.
• Art is often very individual. 
• Art has meaning but is seldom usable.

Design

• Design is a solution to a problem. It answers a question asked.
• Design communicates a distinct message. Whether it is information (as in the instance of graphic design) or function, design is a communication device.
• Good design will engage a person to do something – such as sit in a comfortably-designed chair – or display a direct message.
• Design projects are created for a client or purpose. 
• Design projects are planned and “designed”, and have a specific audience in mind.
• Design is collaborative, you're working with a client.
• Each design project has a purpose or usefulness.

References: 

http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/design-vs-art/

http://designshack.net/articles/art-vs-design-are-they-the-same-thing/

http://www.aiga.org/art-vs-design/